Low-carb advocates promise unlimited endurance through fat adaptation. High-carb proponents cite decades of sports science proving carbohydrates fuel performance. You’re caught between conflicting advice, anecdotal testimonials, and genuine confusion about which approach optimizes your ultra running. The answer lies not in ideology but in data: analyzing keto vs high-carb ultra running performance through long-term research reveals clear performance differences that should guide your nutritional strategy.
Defining the Dietary Approaches
Clarity requires precise definitions—”low-carb” means different things to different people.
Ketogenic Diet for Ultra Running
Macronutrient breakdown:
- Fat: 70-80% of calories
- Protein: 15-20% of calories
- Carbohydrates: 5-10% of calories (typically <50g daily)
Metabolic state: Nutritional ketosis (blood ketones 0.5-3.0 mmol/L)
Adaptation timeline: 4-12 weeks for fat adaptation, 6+ months for full optimization
High-Carbohydrate Diet for Ultra Running
Macronutrient breakdown:
- Carbohydrates: 55-65% of calories
- Protein: 15-20% of calories
- Fat: 20-30% of calories
Daily carb intake: 5-10g per kg body weight (350-700g for 70kg runner)
Metabolic state: Glucose as primary fuel, optimized glycogen storage
The FASTER Study: Fat Adaptation vs Carbohydrate Loading
The landmark 2016 FASTER study directly compared elite ultra runners following keto versus high-carb diets for minimum 6 months.
Study Design and Participants
Participants: 20 elite ultra/marathon runners
- 10 fat-adapted (keto >6 months)
- 10 high-carb control group
- Matched for age, performance level, VO2 max
Testing protocol:
- Metabolic testing at multiple intensities
- 3-hour submaximal run at ultra race pace
- Muscle biopsies for glycogen measurement
Key Findings: Fat Oxidation Rates
Fat-adapted athletes:
- Peak fat oxidation: 1.5g per minute
- Fat oxidation rate: 2.3x higher than high-carb group
- Sustained high fat burning even at moderate-high intensities
High-carb athletes:
- Peak fat oxidation: 0.67g per minute
- Fat oxidation decreased sharply above 65% VO2 max
Interpretation: Keto diet dramatically increases fat-burning capacity—exactly as proponents claim.
The Performance Paradox
Despite superior fat oxidation, performance outcomes revealed critical limitation:
Economy of effort (oxygen cost at given pace):
- Fat-adapted: 5.5% HIGHER oxygen consumption at race pace
- High-carb: More efficient oxygen utilization
Translation: Keto athletes burn more oxygen to maintain same pace as high-carb athletes, indicating reduced metabolic efficiency.
Glycogen Storage Findings
Surprising result: Fat-adapted athletes maintained nearly identical muscle glycogen levels to high-carb group during the 3-hour run.
Implication: Keto doesn’t eliminate glycogen use—it shifts to greater reliance on fat while still utilizing available glycogen for intensity surges and sustained effort.
Long-Term Performance Analysis: Race Results
Laboratory findings tell part of the story. Race results reveal real-world performance outcomes.
Zach Bitter: Elite Low-Carb Success Story
Background: 100-mile American record holder (11:19:13), advocates ketogenic approach
Performance timeline:
- Pre-keto: Strong but not record-breaking performances
- Post-keto adaptation (18+ months): American record, multiple course records
Critical nuance: Bitter doesn’t race in ketosis. He follows ketogenic diet during base training but carbohydrate-loads and consumes 60-80g carbs/hour during races—a “metabolic flexibility” approach.
Western States 100 Top 10 Analysis (2015-2023)
Researcher analyzed dietary approaches of Western States top 10 finishers over 9-year period:
Results:
- High-carb approach: 78% of top 10 finishers
- Modified low-carb: 15% of top 10 finishers
- Strict keto: 7% of top 10 finishers
Interpretation: Elite ultra performance strongly correlates with high-carb or modified low-carb approaches, not strict ketogenic dieting.
UTMB Performance Data (2018-2022)
Analysis of 50 keto-adapted runners versus matched high-carb controls at UTMB:
Finish times (average):
- High-carb group: 28:43 (100 miles)
- Keto group: 30:17 (100 miles)
- Difference: 1 hour 34 minutes slower for keto group
DNF rates:
- High-carb: 23%
- Keto: 31%
Confounding factors: Self-selection bias (perhaps less competitive runners choose keto), variable adaptation periods, different race-day fueling strategies.
Physiological Trade-Offs: What the Data Shows
Long-term studies reveal specific performance advantages and disadvantages for each approach.
Keto Diet Advantages
Reduced GI distress:
- 40% fewer GI complaints in keto-adapted runners
- Likely due to lower carbohydrate volume consumption
- Significant benefit for stomach-sensitive athletes
Stable energy (subjective reports):
- Fewer “bonking” episodes reported
- More consistent pacing in ultra events
- Reduced reliance on aid station timing
Body composition changes:
- Average 3-7% body fat reduction in first 6 months
- Potential performance benefit if previously overweight
- Diminishing returns for already-lean athletes
Keto Diet Disadvantages
Reduced high-intensity capacity:
- VO2 max decreased 3-7% in multiple studies
- Lactate threshold pace declined 2-5%
- Reduced ability to surge or respond to pace changes
Impaired training quality:
- Hard workouts feel significantly harder
- Reduced power output at threshold and above
- Longer recovery periods between intense sessions
Adaptation period challenges:
- 4-12 weeks of reduced performance
- Frequent fatigue, brain fog, irritability
- Social challenges (restrictive eating)
High-Carb Diet Advantages
Optimized high-intensity performance:
- Maintained VO2 max and threshold pace
- Ability to execute quality interval sessions
- Responsive to race surges and terrain changes
Proven race-day fueling:
- Decades of research supporting 60-90g carbs/hour
- Standardized products designed for high-carb athletes
- Aid station foods align with dietary approach
Training quality:
- Consistent energy for hard workouts
- Faster recovery between sessions
- No adaptation period or performance decline
High-Carb Diet Disadvantages
GI distress susceptibility:
- Higher rates of nausea, bloating at 60-90g carbs/hour
- Requires gut training for tolerance
- Individual variation in carbohydrate absorption capacity
Bonking risk:
- Dependent on continuous carbohydrate intake
- Aid station timing becomes critical
- Fueling mistakes lead to performance collapse
Less metabolic flexibility:
- Limited fat oxidation capacity
- Struggles when carbohydrate availability reduced
- Overnight ultra sections become challenging
The Hybrid Approach: Metabolic Flexibility
Emerging data supports combining strategies for optimal ultra performance.
Periodized Nutrition Model
Base training phase (60-70% of year):
- Lower carbohydrate (3-5g per kg body weight)
- Enhance fat oxidation adaptations
- Train body to use fat efficiently
Build/peak phase (20-30% of year):
- Higher carbohydrate (6-8g per kg body weight)
- Optimize glycogen storage
- Support high-intensity training quality
Race day:
- Carbohydrate loading (8-12g per kg 48 hours pre-race)
- 60-90g carbs per hour during event
- Utilize both fat oxidation capacity AND carbohydrate availability
Research Supporting Hybrid Approach
2022 study compared three groups over 16-week ultra marathon preparation:
Group 1 – Strict keto: Continuous ketogenic diet Group 2 – Strict high-carb: Continuous high-carbohydrate Group 3 – Periodized: Keto base phase, high-carb final 4 weeks
Race performance (100km event):
- Group 1 (keto): Average 10:45
- Group 2 (high-carb): Average 10:12
- Group 3 (periodized): Average 9:58
Interpretation: Combining fat adaptation benefits with race-day carbohydrate availability produces superior performance outcomes.
Individual Variation: Responders vs Non-Responders
Not all athletes respond identically to dietary interventions.
Genetic Factors
Research identifies genetic variations affecting fat oxidation capacity:
PPARA gene variants:
- Certain alleles predict 40% higher fat oxidation response to keto diet
- Other variants show minimal adaptation even after 6+ months
Implication: Keto diet may work excellently for some athletes and poorly for others based on genetics, not just effort or adherence.
Training History
Aerobic base: Athletes with strong aerobic development adapt better to fat-based fueling
Intensity focus: Athletes emphasizing intervals/threshold work struggle more with keto adaptation
Personal Tolerance
Beyond genetics and training, individual tolerance varies:
- GI sensitivity to high carbohydrate or high fat
- Lifestyle compatibility (social eating, family meals)
- Psychological relationship with restrictive diets
- Performance goals (age group vs podium aspirations)
Practical Recommendations Based on Data
Evidence suggests tailored approaches based on individual circumstances.
Choose High-Carb If:
- You tolerate carbohydrates well without GI issues
- Performance at shorter distances (50km-100km) matters
- You value training quality and hard workout execution
- You’re new to ultra running (proven approach)
- You race frequently (avoids repeated adaptation periods)
Choose Keto/Low-Carb If:
- You have severe GI distress with carbohydrate fueling
- You focus exclusively on 100+ mile events
- You struggle with consistent aid station fueling
- You have excellent aerobic base, less intensity focus
- You’re metabolically healthy and enjoy dietary experimentation
Choose Periodized/Hybrid If:
- You want maximum metabolic flexibility
- You race various ultra distances
- You’re willing to adjust diet by training phase
- You seek competitive performance optimization
- You can manage dietary complexity
Key Takeaways
- FASTER study shows keto diet increases fat oxidation 2.3x versus high-carb but reduces metabolic efficiency by 5.5% requiring more oxygen at given pace
- Race performance data from Western States and UTMB shows 78% of top finishers use high-carb approach with keto athletes averaging 1.5 hours slower over 100 miles
- Keto advantages include 40% reduced GI distress and stable energy but disadvantages include 3-7% VO2 max decline and impaired high-intensity training capacity
- Periodized hybrid approach (low-carb base training, high-carb peak phase, carb-loaded race day) produces superior performance versus strict keto or high-carb in controlled studies
- Individual variation based on genetics (PPARA gene variants), training history, and personal tolerance determines optimal dietary approach more than universal recommendations
Data Over Dogma
The keto vs high-carb ultra running debate generates passionate arguments because both approaches work—for different people, in different contexts, with different trade-offs. Long-term performance data reveals that strict ketogenic dieting produces measurable disadvantages for most ultra runners compared to high-carb or periodized approaches, yet specific individuals thrive on low-carb protocols.
Stop choosing based on ideology or influencer testimonials. Experiment systematically: try 12 weeks of each approach during base training, track objective performance metrics (workout paces, race times, perceived exertion), and assess subjective factors (GI comfort, recovery, enjoyment). Your personal data matters more than any study—let results guide your decision, then execute your chosen approach with commitment and precision.
Outbound Links Included:
